I have been a psychologist since 1998. I quickly set up my own psychotherapy practice, drawing on my skills in hypnosis and sophrology, family and systemic therapy, and IQ testing for children (WPPSI, WISC) and adults (WAIS).

Alongside my practice, I have led several scientific research projects and written several books on hypnosis (and chronic pain), philocognition, intelligence and performance, which have become the focus of my interest and of my therapeutic work.

Today, my consultations are directly linked to these subjects

Psychologist

Fanny Nusbaum, psychologue, en consultation d'accompagnement

Consultations from 45 minutes to 1 hour, exclusively by phone.

Individual support

For whom? What format?

Entrepreneurs
Students
Athletes
High school students
Solopreneurs
Mothers
Fathers
Anyone interested
Entrepreneurs
Students
Athletes
High school students
Solopreneurs
Mothers
Fathers
Anyone interested
Supervision of psychologists
Supervision of mental performance coaches
Supervision of coaches

Professional support

It is true that I am mainly known for my work on philocognition, intelligence and performance. My supervision sessions with professionals always go in that direction. But the people who contact me as patients do not necessarily ask explicitly to improve in these areas. From the high school student who wants to find self-confidence for her oral exams, to the co-founder of a company who wants to redefine his role and his professional identity, to the lawyer who needs to handle an urgent conflict with a partner, the mother who would like to better understand and communicate with her child (philocognitive or not), the person going through a divorce, or the triathlete preparing for the Olympic Games: every issue leads to support (if I consider it necessary) aimed at self-enhancement.

What approach?
What philosophy?

Consultations exclusively by phone.

I am an Embellist systemic therapist.

Today, the humanistic approach dominates psychology practices. It rests on an appealing idea: if you welcome a person with enough listening, warmth and non-judgement, they will eventually find their own solutions within themselves. The humanistic approach does not decide, does not guide, does not take a position, so as to let “what needs to emerge” emerge in the patient. Its job is to offer analyses of the patient's reality, analyses generally based on an implicit belief that it is enough to dig into one's suffering and stay permanently in touch with one's so-called “deep self” in order to feel better, without ever transforming the deeper structures, without direction, and above all without aiming for greatness.

But the truth is that it does not work.
Or hardly at all.
People leave sessions relieved, but they are not getting better. Their lives do not change. The patterns come back. The people around them stay the same. Inner conflicts calm down for a while, then resurface. Humanism gives the illusion of improvement, but not the structure for what comes next.

So I built another path: embellism.
It rests on a simple idea: to elevate the individual.
Listening, yes, but not indefinitely. Nor helping them to “accept themselves as they are”. Nor teaching them to tolerate a mediocre environment. But making them clearer, stronger, more aligned. Giving them back their capacity for action, clarity and greatness. The Embellist does not flatter the ego: they organise the ascent.

It is a deeply existentialist stance: you are responsible for surpassing yourself. 

And radically Stoic: you learn to become solid, instead of hoping the world will change to spare you. That is why, every day, I work with all my patients, whatever their issue, to build a path of intelligence and excellence that leads to performance.

Added to this is my systemic stance.
A humanistic psychologist will listen above all to what the individual feels. 

For my part, I seek to understand how it all holds together. 

I analyse the whole structure: the links between lifestyle, thoughts, emotions, decisions, relationship dynamics, and the implicit rules that lock everything in place.

Because, in the vast majority of cases, what is suffering is not the individual :
it is the system in which they are entangled.
And it is this system that I need to decode, restructure and enhance.

I am not sure they can really be called additional “tools”. In reality, neuroscience and hypnosis are fully integrated into my work, and I do not see them as external elements that I bring in from time to time.

My practice can be described as “functional”, in the sense that it explores every dimension of the person's life in the service of embellist support.

How? What tools?

Outils d'accompagnement psychologique de Fanny Nusbaum